> For the complete documentation index, see [llms.txt](https://polymarketguide.gitbook.io/polymarketguide/llms.txt). Markdown versions of documentation pages are available by appending `.md` to page URLs; this page is available as [Markdown](https://polymarketguide.gitbook.io/polymarketguide/case-studies/the-suitgate-saga/market-resolution-and-response.md).
# Market Resolution and Response
### Market Resolution
The market resolved to P4 (No Suit Yet) for both the June 25 and June 30 proposals. In both cases, over 90% of voting power, measured by staked UMA, supported the "No Suit Yet" outcome. For the final dispute, the market resolved to P1 (No Suit).
In the **June 25 dispute**, "No Suit Yet" received **92.74%** of the vote, while "Yes" received **7.26%**.
In the **June 30 dispute**, "No Suit Yet" received **93.76%**, "Yes" received **6.00%**, and "No" received **0.24%**.
In the **July 4 dispute**, "No Suit" received **93.25%**, "Yes" received **5.44%**, "No Suit Yet" received **1.30%**, and "Unknown / 50-50" received **0.02%**.
On **July 8**, *Will Zelenskyy wear a suit before July?* resolved to **No**. It reached a total volume of $242 million, and the order book was fully cleared.
### Market Response
Despite intense debate and widespread social media attention, "Yes" shares never traded above 20ยข during the final window. Traders overwhelmingly priced in alignment with previous resolutions. This may further support the view that many vocal "Yes" supporters were newer market participants unfamiliar with UMA's dispute mechanics or historical precedent.
#### Coming Up
In the next chapter, we'll look at how the community reacted across social media and what it means for Polymarket.
.png?alt=media)
.png?alt=media)
.png?alt=media)