Summary

A consensus of credible reporting means that multiple trustworthy sources independently confirm the same information. It serves as the foundation for verifying events when official confirmation or primary data is unavailable. It is also used as a backup resolution source when direct confirmation is unclear.

The first part of a consensus of credible reporting is source credibility. Outlets should be independent, transparent, and accurate in their reporting. This means a consistent history of being unbiased, engaging in rigorous fact-checking, and maintaining strong editorial standards. While credibility can vary across industries such as politics, sports, and technology, understanding non-credible sources helps prevent misinformation.

The second part is source corroboration, where several credible outlets confirm the same claim through their own reporting. Claims should be corroborated independently, across the political spectrum, and with international outlets when applicable. When claims are challenged, it is best to wait until additional reporting becomes available.

Finally, some markets require a wide or overwhelming consensus, especially for wars, ceasefires, or international negotiations. When facts are contested or slow to develop, confirmation should come from multiple credible reports across regions and perspectives.