> For the complete documentation index, see [llms.txt](https://polymarketguide.gitbook.io/polymarketguide/llms.txt). Markdown versions of documentation pages are available by appending `.md` to page URLs; this page is available as [Markdown](https://polymarketguide.gitbook.io/polymarketguide/rules/consensus/summary.md).

# Summary

A consensus of credible reporting means that multiple trustworthy sources independently confirm the same information. It is commonly used when official confirmation or primary data is unavailable, incomplete, or unclear. It may also serve as a backup resolution source.

The first part of a consensus of credible reporting is **source credibility**. Sources should have a strong track record, use reliable evidence, and maintain clear editorial standards. Credibility can also vary by industry, so the strongest source for politics may not be the strongest source for sports, technology, or global events.

The second part is **source corroboration**, where multiple credible sources confirm the same claim through their own reporting. Stronger corroboration may come from independent sources, sources across the political spectrum, or international and local reporting when relevant. When credible reports conflict, it may be necessary to wait for additional information.

Finally, some markets require a **wide or overwhelming consensus**, especially for wars, ceasefires, or international negotiations. When facts are disputed or slow to develop, resolution may require confirmation from multiple credible sources across regions and perspectives.