> For the complete documentation index, see [llms.txt](https://polymarketguide.gitbook.io/polymarketguide/llms.txt). Markdown versions of documentation pages are available by appending `.md` to page URLs; this page is available as [Markdown](https://polymarketguide.gitbook.io/polymarketguide/rules/consensus.md).

# Consensus of Credible Reporting

If you've read through Polymarket's rules, you've likely seen that many markets list their resolution source as a **consensus of credible reporting**.

### What is a consensus of credible reporting?

A consensus of credible reporting is a flexible and broad standard for verifying events. It allows markets to resolve based on agreement across multiple credible outlets rather than relying on a single source. It means that several independent and trustworthy outlets confirm the same event through consistent reporting.

For example, if Reuters, The New York Times, and The Guardian all report that a major agreement was reached, that may form a consensus of credible reporting.

### When is it used?

A consensus of credible reporting is used when market rules do not specify a single source or when flexibility is needed. It is common in markets about developing or uncertain events, such as ceasefires, trade agreements, geopolitics, or election outcomes.

It can also serve as a backup resolution source when the primary source is unavailable or insufficient.

### Why does this matter?

A consensus of credible reporting allows markets to resolve without relying on a single source. It also requires traders and Oracle voters to determine which sources are credible and whether those sources actually agree.

There are two main parts to a consensus of credible reporting: **source credibility** and **consensus**. The following chapters offer a framework for evaluating both, based on patterns in past market resolutions and general standards for assessing reporting.

This is a framework, not an official standard. Different people may interpret and apply it differently.